1. Reading the
narrative from Mary Prince interested me a lot more than Equiano. It wasn’t
that I didn’t enjoy Equiano, but I think it was because of gender that drew me
into Prince more. Prince heavily focused on the pathos, or emotional, element
in her narrative. I think reading about the abuse and violence very much struck
me. It was interesting to read how in depth she made the violence, especially
from a woman’s perspective. Although, because Prince is a female, I think
writing about abuse and violence is such a strong concept. Many readers would
think that violence would be an idea that is typically addressed by a man, but
on the other hand, writing about such ideas from a woman’s perspective draws in
the female audience with feelings of guilt and disheartenment. Overall, I
really enjoyed reading Mary Prince’s narrative because it was directed more to
my kind of audience – a female perspective. Reading about how she had a family,
and knew who her parents were – something that many slaves did not know – was
really fascinating. Also the fact that she wasn’t separated from her mother and
siblings until she was a little older wasn’t known. I felt like I could almost
feel the same pain and suffering that Prince went through just because the
words she wrote were so strong and believable. Both Equiano and Prince wrote
their narratives to make an argument that slavery was a horrible thing, but
Prince wrote with an emotional tone while Equiano wrote with a more legal tone.
Prince chose to have her audience be women, and since she is a woman, it was
easier to write for women and make them persuade their husbands to abolish
slavery. She tends to come right out and say this is how it is, and it is a
horrible thing that must be abolished. I really loved how much mother/daughter
relationship was written into this story, especially in the beginning. Prince
seemed like she really loved her mother, and I can only imagine how hard it
would be to be sold away from a parent. Obviously, I did not grow up in a time
of slavery, but I don’t know how I would be if I was sold to work on a
plantation, and owned as property. On page 262, Prince writes the line, “How can slaves be happy when they have the
halter round their neck and the whip upon their back?” I found this quote
to really stick out to me because it’s so truthful. There couldn’t have been
any way that a slave was truly happy working on a plantation, and getting
beaten every time they disobeyed their master. I think it stood out to me
because it shows how Prince focused on attracting her audience to side with her
through the use of emotions. She seemed smart enough to make her audience women
who could be drawn into the emotional affect, and persuade their husbands to
side with the abolitionists.
No comments:
Post a Comment